The Great Fracture: Mapping the New Blocs in an Age of Rivalry

Introduction: The End of the Unipolar Moment and the Dawn of a New Contest

The international order that defined the post-Cold War era—a "unipolar moment" underwritten by American military power, financial dominance, and institutional leadership—is over. The relative tranquility of that period has given way to a new and dangerous reality: a structural, long-term great-power rivalry that is fracturing the global landscape. This is not a temporary realignment or a cyclical downturn in relations; it is a fundamental shift in the tectonic plates of global power. The world is breaking into distinct, competitive blocs, each with its own vision for the international order.

This new era is defined by a primary contest between two emerging coalitions. On one side stands the U.S.-led "Western bloc," a network of traditional and new alliances seeking to adapt and preserve the open, rules-based system it has led for decades. On the other is the "Sino-Russian Axis," a coordinated quasi-alliance of revisionist powers whose explicit goal is to dismantle that very system.¹ These two blocs are engaged in a multi-domain struggle that extends beyond traditional military competition into the critical realms of economics, technology, and ideology. The "glue" for the Sino-Russian bond is a shared and deeply held "mutual disdain for a U.S.-led world order".² They are actively working in concert to undermine the pillars of American power, from the dominance of the U.S. dollar to the network of alliances that underpins global security.

Caught between these two giants is the vast and diverse collection of nations often referred to as the "Global South." These countries are not passive spectators but active participants, pursuing strategies of "multi-alignment" to maximize their own strategic autonomy in this contested landscape.³ Their decisions on which economic systems to join, which technological standards to adopt, and which currencies to hold will be decisive in shaping the future of the global order.

The speed and coordination of the challenge from Beijing and Moscow suggest a degree of strategic surprise for the West. The formal declaration of a "no limits partnership" between China and Russia just weeks before the 2022 invasion of Ukraine served as a stark announcement of their intentions.⁵ In response, the West has scrambled to adapt its own structures, launching new high-technology pacts like AUKUS in late 2021 and dramatically intensifying engagement between NATO and its Indo-Pacific partners after 2022.⁷ This timeline reveals a crucial dynamic: the West is, in many respects, in a reactive posture, adapting its alliances to a threat environment that is being actively shaped by its adversaries.

This paper provides a clear-eyed assessment of this new reality. It will map the composition, goals, and strategic doctrines of the competing blocs, providing a comprehensive framework for understanding the threats facing the U.S.-led order. This analysis serves as the essential foundation for the core thesis of BitcoinHegemony.com: that in this new age of rivalry, the primary challenges to American power are financial and technological, and that Bitcoin represents a unique strategic asset for countering these threats and securing U.S. leadership for the 21st century.

The Western Bloc: A Networked Alliance for a New Era

The U.S.-led coalition is not a monolithic entity but a complex, multi-layered "network of networks." It combines the strength of long-standing, treaty-bound alliances with the flexibility of new, purpose-built partnerships and diplomatic forums. This networked approach allows for tailored responses to a wide array of threats, but its complexity also presents significant coordination challenges. The bloc's overarching goal is to adapt the existing international order to this new era of competition, preserving its core principles of open markets, individual liberty, and a rules-based system.

The Euro-Atlantic Core: NATO's Renaissance

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), once questioned for its relevance after the Cold War, has been profoundly revitalized by Russian aggression in Ukraine. It has re-emerged as the undisputed military and political anchor of the Western bloc, demonstrating renewed unity and purpose. However, its mission has fundamentally expanded beyond its traditional geographic confines. The 2022 NATO Strategic Concept explicitly acknowledges that developments in the Indo-Pacific "can directly affect Euro-Atlantic security," signaling a formal recognition of the global nature of the threat posed by systemic rivals.⁸

NATO is no longer merely a European defense pact. It has become a global platform for the world's leading democracies to coordinate on a broad spectrum of security challenges. This includes not only conventional military deterrence but also cooperation on cyber defense, countering hybrid threats and disinformation, enhancing resilience, and developing a unified response to the strategic challenge posed by China.¹⁰ The alliance now serves as the primary forum where the strategic interests of North America and Europe are fused to address the concerted efforts by China and Russia to disrupt the international order.¹¹

The Indo-Pacific Pivot in Practice: Minilaterals and the Hub-and-Spokes System

In the Indo-Pacific, the U.S. is constructing a layered and increasingly interconnected security architecture designed to counter China's military modernization and expansionist ambitions. This architecture combines the long-standing U.S. "hub-and-spokes" system of bilateral alliances with new, agile "minilateral" groupings that bring together key partners for specific strategic purposes.

At the apex of this new structure is AUKUS, a trilateral security partnership between Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States.⁷ Announced in September 2021, AUKUS is not a broad, political alliance but a focused, high-technology military-industrial pact. Its "Pillar 1" is a multi-decade program to provide Australia with a fleet of conventionally-armed, nuclear-powered submarines—a capability that will dramatically enhance the bloc's ability to project power and conduct undersea warfare in the vast maritime theater of the Indo-Pacific.⁷ This involves the unprecedented sharing of highly sensitive U.S. nuclear propulsion technology, a step previously taken only with the UK, underscoring the depth of the commitment.¹⁴ "Pillar 2" of AUKUS focuses on the joint development of other advanced military capabilities, including artificial intelligence, quantum technologies, hypersonics, and electronic warfare, with potential for future collaboration with partners like Japan, Canada, and South Korea.¹⁵ AUKUS is an unambiguous response to China's military buildup and its ambitions in the region.¹³

Complementing this hard-power initiative is the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, or "the Quad," a strategic forum comprising the United States, Japan, Australia, and India.¹⁶ Revitalized in 2017 and elevated to the leader level in 2021, the Quad serves as a key coordinating body for the region's major maritime democracies.¹⁷ While its members stress that it is not a formal military alliance, it provides a platform for strategic alignment and practical cooperation on issues ranging from maritime security and infrastructure development to cybersecurity and public health, all aimed at promoting a "free and open Indo-Pacific" as a counterweight to Chinese influence.¹⁷

These minilateral groupings are built upon the foundation of the U.S. hub-and-spokes system of formal treaty alliances with Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Australia, and Thailand.¹⁶ In recent years, these bilateral ties have been significantly strengthened. The U.S.-Japan alliance has become more entwined than ever, with deeper integration in command and control and defense industrial production.¹⁶ The U.S.-Philippines alliance has experienced a dramatic revitalization under President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., leading to expanded U.S. access to strategic bases and greater coordination in confronting Chinese aggression in the South China Sea.¹⁶ Critically, the U.S. is now actively weaving these spokes together, as demonstrated by the landmark U.S.-Philippines-Japan trilateral summit in April 2024, creating a more cohesive and resilient regional security network.¹⁶

Bridging the Theaters: The NATO-IP4 Nexus

Perhaps the most significant structural evolution in the Western bloc's strategy is the deliberate and accelerating fusion of the Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific security theaters. The West is actively working to create a single, interconnected global alliance network to confront its adversaries, recognizing that the challenges posed by Russia and China are linked and cannot be addressed in regional isolation.¹¹

The primary mechanism for this fusion is the NATO-IP4 nexus, which institutionalizes the relationship between NATO and its four key Indo-Pacific partners: Australia, Japan, South Korea, and New Zealand. Since the 2022 NATO Summit in Madrid, the leaders of the IP4 have become regular and high-profile participants in NATO's most senior deliberations.⁸ This is not merely symbolic. Cooperation is being deepened through formal frameworks, such as Individually Tailored Partnership Programmes (ITPPs), which outline specific areas for collaboration with each partner.⁸

This practical cooperation spans a wide range of critical domains, including enhancing military interoperability, joint efforts in cyber defense, maritime security, countering hybrid threats, and collaborating on emerging and disruptive technologies.⁸ The partners have launched joint flagship projects focused on areas like providing military healthcare support to Ukraine and combating disinformation.⁸ This collaboration is driven by a shared diagnosis of the international security environment: that the actions of authoritarian powers like Russia and China, including their deepening partnership, have direct consequences for the security of both regions.²⁰ The statement from the 2025 NATO Summit explicitly recognized that "the security of the Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific is interconnected" and committed to enhancing defense industrial cooperation between NATO and its Indo-Pacific partners.²² This represents a paradigm shift, moving the relationship beyond ad-hoc cooperation on out-of-area missions to a strategic alignment for mutual defense and deterrence in an era of global competition.⁹

The strength of this networked approach lies in its flexibility and the diverse capabilities it brings to bear. It allows for tailored coalitions to address specific problems—AUKUS for high-end military technology, the Quad for regional diplomacy, and NATO for collective defense and global coordination. However, this very complexity introduces a subtle but significant vulnerability: the risk of internal friction. The rollout of AUKUS, for instance, created a major diplomatic crisis with France, a cornerstone NATO ally, which felt blindsided by the cancellation of its submarine contract with Australia and recalled its ambassadors from Washington and Canberra.⁷ This incident demonstrates that while the network is broad, it is not seamless. Managing this intricate web of overlapping relationships requires immense diplomatic capital and careful coordination. Any failure can create deep fissures within the bloc, undermining the very unity it seeks to project and creating openings that can be readily exploited by adversaries.

Furthermore, while the bloc is often framed around a shared commitment to democracy, its composition reveals a pragmatic focus on strategic alignment over ideological purity. The U.S. has elevated its relationship with communist-led Vietnam to a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership and works closely with India in the Quad, a country that explicitly pursues a foreign policy of "omni-alignment" rather than formal alliance.¹⁷ This pragmatism is a strength, as it allows for the formation of the broadest possible coalition to counter Chinese influence. However, it also complicates the narrative of a purely values-based competition, revealing that the primary organizing principle of the Western bloc in the current era is the strategic imperative of balancing against the Sino-Russian challenge.

The Sino-Russian Axis: A Coordinated Challenge to the Established Order

The alignment between the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation has evolved far beyond a partnership of convenience. It now constitutes a deep, coordinated, and comprehensive quasi-alliance of revisionist powers. Its explicit and overarching strategic objective is to displace U.S. hegemony, dismantle the U.S.-led international order, and reshape the world in a manner conducive to their authoritarian systems.¹ This is not merely about gaining a seat at the table; it is about redesigning the table itself.

The "No-Limits" Partnership: A Quasi-Alliance of Revisionists

The joint declaration of a "no-limits partnership" on February 4, 2022, just weeks before Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, was a watershed moment that laid bare the nature of this alignment.⁵ The partnership is a comprehensive entente spanning the military, economic, diplomatic, and technological domains, bound by a shared antipathy toward the United States and the rules-based order.¹ This cooperation is operationalized through concrete actions designed to directly challenge U.S. power and influence.

Militarily, their armed forces conduct increasingly sophisticated joint exercises, such as long-range bomber patrols that have jointly probed Alaska's air defense identification zone, designed to test U.S. defenses and signal their ability to operate in concert.¹ Diplomatically, they vote in lockstep at the United Nations to degrade established norms of international law and human rights, and they amplify a shared narrative of terminal U.S. decline aimed at winning support in the Global South.⁶ Economically, China has provided a vital lifeline to Russia, enabling it to sustain its war of aggression in Ukraine despite unprecedented Western sanctions. This includes the supply of vast quantities of dual-use goods, such as microelectronics, drone engines, and machine tools, that are essential for reconstituting Russia's defense industrial base.²⁴ While the partnership has its limits and is shaped by shifting geopolitical realities, both Beijing and Moscow view each other as indispensable strategic partners in their shared struggle against the West.²⁴

The Institutional Scaffolding: Building a Parallel Order

The Sino-Russian Axis is not merely a bilateral relationship; it is the core of a broader effort to construct a parallel institutional architecture centered on Eurasia, designed to rival and eventually supplant Western-led structures.

The political and security centerpiece of this emerging order is the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO). Established in 2001, the SCO was initially focused on counter-terrorism and border security in Central Asia.²⁶ It has since expanded dramatically to become a major Eurasian political bloc, now including India, Pakistan, Iran, and Belarus as full members, with a host of observer states and dialogue partners stretching across Asia and the Middle East.²⁶ The SCO's stated goals have broadened to include deeper economic cooperation and the explicit promotion of a "fair, multipolar world order" based on principles that challenge Western norms, such as non-interference in internal affairs—a shield for authoritarian governance.²⁶ It serves as the primary political forum for the Axis to coordinate its vision for a post-American world.

The military component of this architecture is primarily represented by the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), a Russian-led military alliance of six post-Soviet states.²⁷ The CSTO was intended to function as a Eurasian counterpart to NATO, with a mutual defense clause similar to NATO's Article 5.²⁸ However, the organization's credibility and cohesion are facing a severe crisis. Its conspicuous inaction following Azerbaijan's 2022 attacks on Armenia, a CSTO member state, was a catastrophic failure that exposed the hollowness of its security guarantee.²⁸ This failure led directly to Armenia freezing its participation in the alliance and publicly questioning its long-term membership, a major blow to Russian prestige and its ability to project power even within its own proclaimed sphere of influence.²⁸

This fracturing of the CSTO reveals a critical dynamic within the Axis. While China's influence grows through institutions like the SCO, Russia's conventional military and diplomatic power, bogged down and degraded by the war in Ukraine, is visibly waning. This has forced Russia into a position of increasing dependency on China, not as an equal partner, but as a junior one providing raw materials and geopolitical disruption in exchange for economic and technological support. This asymmetry, while currently manageable due to their shared anti-U.S. agenda, represents a potential long-term fault line in their alignment. A desperate or reckless Russia could eventually become a strategic liability for a China that prioritizes stability for its long-term economic ambitions.

Strategic Doctrine: State Control and Asymmetric Warfare

The Axis's grand strategy is fundamentally asymmetric. Recognizing that they cannot yet match the United States in a direct, conventional military confrontation, China and Russia are waging a campaign to bypass American strengths and attack the foundational pillars of its global power: its financial dominance and its technological leadership. This is a war fought not primarily with tanks and aircraft carriers, but with currency swaps, payment systems, technology standards, and gold bars.

The economic front is a coordinated, multi-pronged assault on the hegemony of the U.S. dollar, a strategy known as de-dollarization.

• Local Currency Trade: The most dramatic progress has been in bilateral trade settlement. As of 2024, over 95% of trade between China and Russia is now settled in their national currencies, the yuan and the ruble, almost completely eliminating the U.S. dollar from their record $240 billion trade relationship.²⁹
• Alternative Financial Rails: To facilitate this non-dollar trade, they are actively working to link their respective domestic payment systems—China's Cross-Border Interbank Payment System (CIPS) and Russia's System for Transfer of Financial Messages (SPFS)—to create a viable alternative to the Western-controlled SWIFT network for international transactions.²⁹ This infrastructure is designed to sanction-proof their economies from U.S. financial pressure.
• Gold Accumulation: Both nations have been at the forefront of a global trend of central banks repatriating and accumulating physical gold reserves. Between 2013 and 2023, Russia and China were the top two countries in the world for increasing their gold holdings, adding a combined total of over 2,400 tonnes.³³ This is a clear strategic move to diversify reserves away from the dollar and anchor their financial systems with a neutral, physical asset that cannot be devalued or sanctioned by a foreign power.³⁴

The technological front is equally critical, focused on establishing state-controlled ecosystems and exporting a model of digital authoritarianism.

• State-Directed Technology: China and Russia are deepening their collaboration on strategic technologies with clear dual-use military applications. This includes the joint development and deployment of 5G networks, where Chinese firms like Huawei are key partners for Russian telecom companies, and satellite navigation systems, where they are integrating Russia's GLONASS with China's Beidou.³⁷ This cooperation not only enhances their military capabilities in areas like drone operations and precision targeting but is also part of a broader push to set global technology standards that are independent of, and competitive with, those of the West.³⁹
• The e-CNY as a Strategic Weapon: China's Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), the digital yuan or e-CNY, is the spearhead of its vision for a new digital financial order. While promoted domestically for efficiency, its strategic implications are profound. The e-CNY is a centralized, programmable currency that offers the Chinese state an unprecedented tool for financial surveillance and control over its population.⁴¹ Beijing's ambition is not confined to its borders; it seeks to internationalize the e-CNY, particularly through its Belt and Road and Digital Silk Road initiatives.⁴² An internationalized e-CNY could offer a vehicle for cross-border payments that completely bypasses the dollar-based system, presenting a direct challenge to the open, private, and free-market principles that underpin Western finance.⁴³

The Strategic Balance Sheet: A Comparative Analysis

To fully grasp the dynamics of this new global contest, it is essential to move beyond broad descriptions and conduct a systematic, comparative analysis of the competing blocs. The following table serves as a strategic dashboard, distilling the core attributes, goals, and vulnerabilities of the U.S.-led West, the Sino-Russian Axis, and the non-aligned Global South across key domains. Each entry provides a concise assessment, grounding the high-level comparison in the detailed evidence presented throughout this report.

The Core Vulnerabilities: Fault Lines of the 21st Century

The grand strategic competition of the 21st century will likely be decided not by the strengths of the competing blocs, but by their ability to manage their core vulnerabilities. Each side possesses a unique and potentially fatal set of internal weaknesses that their rival seeks to exploit. For the West, the corrosion is political and financial. For the East, it is structural and demographic.

The West's Internal Corrosion

The primary threats to the U.S.-led order are not external armies but internal maladies that attack the very foundations of its power: its financial credibility and its political cohesion.

The Debt Spiral: The single greatest strategic vulnerability of the United States, and by extension the entire Western bloc, is its staggering national debt. As of 2024-2025, the U.S. national debt has surged past $36 trillion, representing a debt-to-GDP ratio exceeding 123%.⁴⁹ This is not an abstract accounting issue; it is a systemic risk of the highest order. The debt is growing at an accelerating pace, with projections showing it will continue to climb for the foreseeable future due to a structural mismatch between government spending and revenues.⁵⁰ To finance this deficit, the U.S. Treasury must continuously issue new debt, creating a dependency on the willingness of global investors to keep buying U.S. bonds. This dynamic has several corrosive effects. It leads to higher interest payments, which are now the fastest-growing part of the federal budget, crowding out spending on defense and other critical priorities.⁵⁰ More importantly, it provides powerful ammunition to adversaries promoting de-dollarization, who can point to America's fiscal irresponsibility as a reason for other nations to seek alternatives to holding U.S. debt.⁵² The very credibility of the U.S. dollar, the bedrock of American global power, is being eroded from within by its own government's fiscal policies.

The Polarization Paralysis: The second critical vulnerability is the deep and toxic political polarization within the United States. This is no longer a simple matter of policy disagreement; it has evolved into what experts term "pernicious polarization," where political factions view each other as existential enemies and democratic processes as a zero-sum competition for power.⁵⁸ This has direct and damaging consequences for national security. It leads to policy gridlock, as seen in the protracted delays in passing defense appropriations bills and critical aid packages for allies like Ukraine, which allowed Russia to gain an advantage on the battlefield.⁵⁷ This paralysis calls into question the very sustainability of U.S. foreign policy commitments, as allies worry that a change in administration could lead to a radical reversal of policy.⁵⁷ For a security strategy that rests on a global network of alliances, the perception of American unreliability, unpredictability, and internal distraction is a devastating blow to the trust that holds the entire structure together. Adversaries like Russia and China actively seek to exacerbate these divisions through information warfare, understanding that a polarized and paralyzed America is an America that cannot effectively lead.⁵⁷

The East's Structural Headwinds

The Sino-Russian Axis faces vulnerabilities that are arguably even more profound because they are demographic and structural, making them far more difficult to reverse through policy changes.

The Demographic Winter: Both China and Russia are staring into a demographic abyss. After decades of the one-child policy, China's population is now in absolute decline, and its fertility rate has fallen to a record low, far below the replacement level needed to sustain the population.⁵⁹ This demographic cliff will have catastrophic long-term consequences: a rapidly shrinking workforce, a dramatic decline in the number of young consumers, and an immense economic burden from a rapidly aging population that will strain healthcare and pension systems to the breaking point.⁶² This trend threatens to end China's era of rapid economic growth and undermine its long-term ambitions to become the world's dominant power.⁶² Russia faces a similar demographic crisis, with a low birth rate and high mortality, particularly among working-age men.⁶¹ This situation has been exacerbated by the immense casualties of the war in Ukraine and the exodus of hundreds of thousands of its best-educated citizens. This demographic decay will inevitably constrain Russia's economic potential and its ability to sustain a large, modern military over the long term.⁶⁰

The Inefficiency of Command: The state-capitalist economic models of China and Russia, while effective at mobilizing national resources for top-down strategic priorities, are riddled with deep-seated inefficiencies. These command economies are characterized by the dominance of inefficient state-owned enterprises, a financial system that allocates capital based on political connections rather than market logic, and pervasive corruption.⁴⁵ This system stifles the bottom-up, entrepreneurial dynamism that is the true engine of technological innovation.⁶³ While China has proven adept at industrial policy, scaling up existing technologies, and even outright intellectual property theft, its ability to generate the kind of foundational, paradigm-shifting breakthroughs that have historically defined American technological leadership remains questionable. Over the long run, the inefficiencies and lack of creative freedom inherent in their centrally planned systems may prove to be a decisive disadvantage in the high-stakes competition for technological supremacy.

These asymmetric vulnerabilities create a dangerous strategic dynamic. The West's weaknesses—debt and polarization—are severe but are ultimately political and financial in nature. They could, in theory, be addressed through political will or financial innovation. The East's weaknesses—demographics and the structure of their economies—are far more intractable and are on a near-irreversible long-term decline. The leadership in Beijing and Moscow is acutely aware of this ticking clock. This awareness may be driving them to adopt a more aggressive and risk-acceptant foreign policy in the present. They may believe they have a limited "window of opportunity" to use their current peak strength to lock in geopolitical gains—whether in Ukraine, over Taiwan, or in the South China Sea—before their long-term structural decay begins to irreversibly erode their national power. This makes the current decade a period of maximum danger.

Conclusion: The Contested Landscape and the Strategic Imperative

The strategic map of the 21st century is now clear. The world has fractured into two primary, competing blocs, with a vast and contested arena of non-aligned nations caught in between. The U.S.-led Western bloc, a flexible and expanding network of alliances, is seeking to adapt and defend an international order built on open markets and democratic values. It is confronted by a determined Sino-Russian Axis, a revisionist quasi-alliance using asymmetric strategies to dismantle that order and replace it with one conducive to authoritarianism.

This is a structural, multi-domain, and long-term rivalry. The primary lines of conflict are not on traditional battlefields, but in the domains of finance, technology, and ideology. The analysis reveals that the most acute threats to American hegemony are not fundamentally military, but financial and political. The Sino-Russian Axis is waging a coordinated war on the dominance of the U.S. dollar, a campaign made more potent by America's own staggering national debt, which corrodes the dollar's credibility from within.⁵¹ Simultaneously, the rise of digital authoritarianism, spearheaded by China's e-CNY, presents a direct ideological and technological challenge to the West's vision of a free, open, and private digital future.⁴³

The West's core vulnerabilities—a debilitating debt spiral and a paralyzing political polarization—are self-inflicted wounds that its adversaries are skillfully exploiting. They undermine the very foundations of American power: the trust in its currency and the reliability of its commitments. To prevail in this new era of competition, the United States cannot rely on its legacy advantages alone. It requires a new strategic asset, one that can directly address its core financial vulnerabilities while simultaneously championing its core values.

This strategic imperative sets the stage for a radical rethinking of national security. The United States must find a way to hedge against its own fiscal excesses, counter the de-dollarization efforts of its rivals, and offer a compelling alternative to the vision of digital surveillance and control. This is the strategic problem that defines our time. And it is in this context that a decentralized, censorship-resistant, and absolutely scarce digital asset emerges not as a mere speculative instrument, but as a potential tool of national strategy. The case must be made that Bitcoin can serve as a strategic reserve to insulate the U.S. from its debt crisis ⁵², a neutral monetary network to outmaneuver the closed systems of its rivals, and a powerful symbol of financial freedom in the global fight against digital authoritarianism.⁶⁶ The contested landscape has been mapped; the next step is to deploy the tools to win the contest.

Works cited

1. No Limits? The China- Russia Relationship and U.S. Foreign Policy, accessed July 8, 2025, https://cdn.cfr.org/sites/default/files/report_pdf/No%20Limits.pdf
2. What the 'no limits' partnership between Russia and China means for the U.S. - Think, accessed July 8, 2025, https://think.kera.org/2024/10/04/what-the-no-limits-partnership-between-russia-and-china-means-for-the-u-s/
3. Multi-alignment and De-risking: The Global South Response to World Fragmentation - Ifri, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.ifri.org/sites/default/files/2024-10/ifri_ben_hammouda_multi_alignment_derisking_2024.pdf
4. Multi-alignment and De-risking: The Global South Response to ... - Ifri, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.ifri.org/en/papers/multi-alignment-and-de-risking-global-south-response-world-fragmentation
5. NATO Chief Predicts China's Plan For Taiwan - Newsweek, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.newsweek.com/nato-mark-rutte-china-taiwan-vladimir-putin-russia-2095125
6. China's Xi Lands in Moscow to Beef Up 'No-Limits' Putin Partnership, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2025/05/07/chinas-xi-lands-in-moscow-to-beef-up-no-limits-putin-partnership-a89011
7. AUKUS - Wikipedia, accessed July 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AUKUS
8. Topic: Relations with partners in the Indo-Pacific region - NATO, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_183254.htm
9. How NATO and its Indo-Pacific partners can work together in an era ..., accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/how-nato-and-its-indo-pacific-partners-can-work-together-in-an-era-of-strategic-competition/
10. Topic: Relations with Australia - NATO, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_48899.htm
11. Securing a free and open world: A US-EU blueprint to counter China and Russia, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/securing-a-free-and-open-world-a-us-eu-blueprint-to-counter-china-and-russia/
12. U.S.-European Cooperation is at a Crossroads in the Indo-Pacific < Sasakawa USA, accessed July 8, 2025, https://spfusa.org/publications/u-s-european-cooperation-is-at-a-crossroads-in-the-indo-pacific/
13. Full article: The AUKUS agreement: a new form of the plurilateral defence alliance? A view from downunder - Taylor & Francis Online, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14751798.2024.2385704
14. Defense Department Conducting Review of AUKUS Security Pact - USNI News, accessed July 8, 2025, https://news.usni.org/2025/06/11/defense-department-conducting-review-of-aukus-security-pact
15. Faux-Alliances: AUKUS and the Quad are No Asian NATO, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/faux-alliances-aukus-and-the-quad-are-no-asian-nato/
16. The State—and Fate—of America's Indo-Pacific Alliances - RAND, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2024/11/the-state-and-fate-of-americas-indo-pacific-alliances.html
17. The United States' Enduring Commitment to the Indo-Pacific Region | The White House, accessed July 8, 2025, https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2025/01/10/the-united-states-enduring-commitment-to-the-indo-pacific-region/
18. The State – and Fate – of America's Indo-Pacific Alliances - The Diplomat, accessed July 8, 2025, https://thediplomat.com/2024/10/the-state-and-fate-of-americas-indo-pacific-alliances/
19. Cultivating America's alliances and partners in the Indo-Pacific - Brookings Institution, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/cultivating-americas-alliances-and-partners-in-the-indo-pacific/
20. 【Cooperation between European and Indo-Pacific Powers in the US alliance system project：Policy Paper Vol. 4】Mirroring Russia-China Strategic Cooperation in the Arctic | List of Articles | International Information Network Analysis, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.spf.org/iina/en/articles/liselotte_odgaard_01.html
21. Full article: Redefining NATO's Indo-Pacific partnerships: cooperative security meets collective defence and deterrence - Taylor & Francis Online, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14799855.2024.2339213
22. Statement between NATO Secretary General and the four Indo-Pacific partners, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_236714.htm
23. Multipolarity and Multi-Alignment: India's Quest for Autonomy in a Changing World - S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, accessed July 8, 2025, https://rsis.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/IP25042.pdf
24. The China-Russia relationship and threats to vital US interests ..., accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-china-russia-relationship-and-threats-to-vital-us-interests/
25. China-Russia alignment – a shared vision, without fully seeing eye to eye | Merics, accessed July 8, 2025, https://merics.org/en/comment/china-russia-alignment-shared-vision-without-fully-seeing-eye-eye
26. Shanghai Cooperation Organisation - Wikipedia, accessed July 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanghai_Cooperation_Organisation
27. Countries - Collective Security Treaty Organization, accessed July 8, 2025, https://en.odkb-csto.org/countries/
28. Collective Security Treaty Organization - Wikipedia, accessed July 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_Security_Treaty_Organization
29. Monetary cooperation promotes China-Russia trade relations - CGTN, accessed July 8, 2025, https://news.cgtn.com/news/2025-06-19/Monetary-cooperation-promotes-China-Russia-trade-relations-1Ekua0V2hjy/p.html
30. Trade with China mainly settled in yuan, rubles: Russian deputy PM - Global Times, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202403/1309666.shtml
31. Russia–China Foreign Trade Near Dollar-Free: Almost All in Rubles, Yuan, accessed July 8, 2025, https://news.bitcoin.com/russia-china-foreign-trade-near-dollar-free-almost-all-in-rubles-yuan/
32. What Are the Limits to Russia's “Yuanization”? | Carnegie ..., accessed July 8, 2025, https://carnegieendowment.org/russia-eurasia/politika/2024/05/china-russia-yuan?lang=en
33. Ranked: The Countries That Added the Most Gold Reserves (2013-2023), accessed July 8, 2025, https://elements.visualcapitalist.com/ranked-the-countries-that-added-the-most-gold-reserves-2013-2023/
34. Gold Reserves - Countries - List - Trading Economics, accessed July 8, 2025, https://tradingeconomics.com/country-list/gold-reserves
35. De-dollarization: Are China and the BRICS building a gold-standard trading system?, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SV-jpJqDX7c
36. Gold Becomes Strategically Important to Russia - RAND, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.rand.org/news/press/2024/09/09.html
37. Hi-Tech, High Risk? Russo-Chinese Cooperation on Emerging ..., accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/hi-tech-high-risk-russo-chinese-cooperation-emerging-technologies
38. Russia-China 5G, Satellite Cooperation Poses Risk For Ukraine, Report Warns - Radio Free Europe, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-china-5g-satellite-cooperation-war-ukraine/32843873.html
39. A new Sino-Russian high-tech partnership - ASPI, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.aspi.org.au/report/new-sino-russian-high-tech-partnership/
40. 5G Networks | Intelligence, Surveillance, and Privacy - CSIS, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.csis.org/programs/strategic-technologies-program/intelligence-surveillance-and-privacy/5g-networks
41. China's Digital Currency: The hopes and fears of the e-CNY, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.chinacenter.net/2023/china-currents/22-1/chinas-digital-currency-the-hopes-and-fears-of-the-e-cny/
42. An International Digital Yuan: (Vane) Ambitions, (Excessive) Alarmism and (Pragmatic) Expectations | IAI Istituto Affari Internazionali, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.iai.it/en/pubblicazioni/c05/international-digital-yuan-vane-ambitions-excessive-alarmism-and-pragmatic
43. China's Digital Yuan: Shifting Global Currency Power, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/china-s-digital-yuan-shifting-global-currency-power
44. The AI Superpower Showdown. Inside the US-China Race for… | by Mark Craddock | Medium, accessed July 8, 2025, https://medium.com/@mcraddock/inside-the-us-china-race-for-technological-supremacy-52cb5c3df063
45. Differences in Transition Paths: Russia versus China - ifo Institut, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/dice-report-2019-3-korhonen-october.pdf
46. Russia-China Economic Relations - Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.swp-berlin.org/10.18449/2024RP06/
47. China and Russia: Economic Unequals - CSIS, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.csis.org/analysis/china-and-russia-economic-unequals
48. In a Multipolar World, Global South Finds Its Moment | BCG, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.bcg.com/publications/2025/in-a-multipolar-world-global-south-finds-its-moment
49. Understanding the National Debt | U.S. Treasury Fiscal Data, accessed July 8, 2025, https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/americas-finance-guide/national-debt/
50. What Is the National Debt Right Now? - Peter G. Peterson Foundation, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.pgpf.org/national-debt-clock/
51. Bitcoin vs. Gold: The Ultimate Hedge Against Inflation and Sovereign Debt? - Bitwise, accessed July 8, 2025, https://bitwiseinvestments.eu/blog/crypto-research/bitcoin-vs-gold-the-ultimate-hedge-against-inflation-and-sovereign-debt/
52. Strategic Bitcoin reserve: The national debt solution for Trump – The ..., accessed July 8, 2025, https://ucsdguardian.org/2025/02/03/strategic-bitcoin-reserve-the-national-debt-solution-for-trump/
53. India's Strategic Balance Between Global South and West - Drishti IAS, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.drishtiias.com/daily-updates/daily-news-editorials/india-s-strategic-balance-between-global-south-and-west
54. Official text: Summary of NATO's Quantum Technologies Strategy, 16-Jan.-2024 - NATO, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_221777.htm
55. Preparing for the future of quantum computing | McKinsey, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/quantum-computing-game-on
56. ASEAN is turning global tensions into regional opportunities | World ..., accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/07/why-asean-must-transform-global-tensions-into-regional-opportunities/
57. Michaela Dodge, U.S. Domestic Polarization and Allied Assurance ..., accessed July 8, 2025, https://nipp.org/information_series/michaela-dodge-u-s-domestic-polarization-and-allied-assurance-no-602-october-21-2024/
58. At Disagree Better Event, National Security Experts Warn of the Dangers of Toxic Polarization, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.nga.org/news/commentary/at-disagree-better-event-national-security-experts-warn-of-the-dangers-of-toxic-polarization/
59. China's New Cash Plan to Tackle Birth Rate Threat - Newsweek, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.newsweek.com/china-plan-cash-incentive-birth-rate-population-decline-2095387
60. Putin's Irrational Demographic Policies Are Doomed to Fail, accessed July 8, 2025, https://carnegieendowment.org/russia-eurasia/politika/2025/02/russia-demographic-politics?lang=en
61. Short-term stability and long-term problems. The demographic situation in Russia, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/osw-commentary/2024-07-03/short-term-stability-and-long-term-problems-demographic
62. China's Demographic Crisis: A Challenge for the Future | Atlas ..., accessed July 8, 2025, https://atlasinstitute.org/china-demographic-crisis/
63. China's Future Will Reflect Russia's - Kellogg Insight, accessed July 8, 2025, https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/chinas-future-will-reflect-russias
64. U.S. National Debt Hits $35 Trillion, Boosting Bitcoin's Appeal | Nasdaq, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/us-national-debt-hits-35-trillion-boosting-bitcoins-appeal
65. Political Polarization and National Security: Challenges and Solutions, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.wgi.world/political-polarization-and-national-security-challenges-and-solutions/
66. Why Bitcoin Matters for Freedom | TIME, accessed July 8, 2025, https://time.com/5486673/bitcoin-venezuela-authoritarian/
67. Is Bitcoin Good for Democracy?, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/news-and-updates/is-bitcoin-good-for-democracy/

The U.S. Can Support Democracy and Human Rights Through Bitcoin, accessed July 8, 2025, https://www.btcpolicy.org/articles/the-u-s-can-support-democracy-and-human-rights-through-bitcoin